Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Æó¼â¼º ¼ö¸é ¹«È£Èí ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Àӽà ÇÏ¾Ç Àü¹æ À̵¿ ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á°á°ú ºÐ¼®

Assessment of Treatment Outcome after Using Temporary Mandibular Advancement Devices in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

¹ÚÁØÇü, ¿À¼ö¼®, È«Á¾¶ô, ±èâ¼ö, ÆØÁØ¿µ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁØÇü ( Park Joon-Hyung ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
¿À¼ö¼® ( Oh Su-Seok ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
È«Á¾¶ô ( Hong Jong-Rak ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±èâ¼ö ( Kim Chang-Soo ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÆØÁØ¿µ ( Paeng Jun-Young ) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °­ºÏ»ï¼ºº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of temporary mandibular advancement devices (MAD) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients

Methods: 28 patients (male 21, female 7) undergoing temporary mandibular advancement device treatment for OSA were selected from 2011.01. to 2012.02. in the department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery at SamsungMedicalCenter. Treatment efficacy was determined by polysomnography (PSG) at baseline & after MAD delivery. The response group was defined as >50% Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) reduction plus post-MAD AHI <10, and the non-response group was defined as <50% AHI reduction. The lateral cephalogram was analysed including SNA, SNB, UL, MPH, PAS, PASU, and PAST using V-ceph$^{TM}$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö (Cybermed, USA).

Results: The responsers were 23 patients, and non-responsers were 5 patients. The AHI was significantly reduced with temporary MAD ($8.08{\pm}7.93$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö) compared with baseline ($28.51{\pm}20.56$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö) in the response group (n=23). No significant difference was observed between pre MAD and post MAD except SNB on cephalometric analysis. Among 11 patients successfully treated with the temporary device, 9 patients said that using permanent device brings better effect too.

Conclusion: These results indicate that the Temporary MAD could not be the only effective tools on OSA but also be used to predict patient¡¯s reactivity about permanent appliance treatment. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the relations between temporary MAD and permanent MAD.

Å°¿öµå

Mandibular advancement device;Obstructive sleep apnea;Oral appliance

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed